Dismissed
Mehboob Sahebjade Pirjade v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/280/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7.wp280.14.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 280 OF 2014
Mehboob Sahebjade Pirjade. ...Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent.
None for petitioner.
Smt. Aruna S. Pai, APP for State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 4, 2019.
P.C.:
1 Learned APP submits that investigation is already over and now both the crimes are pending trial.
2 We therefore, find that this letter dated 26/12/2013 and prayer therein have become infructuous. Petition disposed of.
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J)
Talwalkar
Mehboob Saheb Jeade Pirjade
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
B.P. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court