Petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 165 of 2019. Court disposed of the petition as prayer for transfer of investigation was rendered infructuous as 'B' summary was already submitted to trial court, keeping other options open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48-165.2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 165 OF 2019
Sarika Rajendra Sharma … Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra … Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Smt.Aruna Pai, APP for the State.
Mr. Vishwajit Jagtap, API, Wanvadi police station, Pune present.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 03, 2019
P.C. :
Petitioner is absent. Learned APP has on instructions from Mr. Jagtap, API from Wanwadi Police Station, Pune informs that “B” summary in the matter is already submitted to the trial court. In view of the above, prayer made by the petitioner for transfer of the investigation is rendered infructuous. Keeping all other lawful options available to the petitioner open, petition stands disposed of.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
(B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1/1
nilegaonkar
Sarika Rajendra Sharma
State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
NITIN W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
