Petitioner sought leave for continuous cross-examination of complainant in cross-bound Sessions trial. Petition was disposed as infructuous due to acquittal and release on 17/9/2016.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8.wp170.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 170 OF 2015
Prakash Gopal Jadhav.
...Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents.
None for the Petitioner.
Smt. Aruna S. Pai, APP for State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 4, 2019.
P.C.:
1 The petitioner seeks leave to cross-examine complainant at one stretch without any obstruction. He has sent this application on 11/12/2014 mentioning the Sessions Case No. 637 of 2012, which was made time bound.
2 Nominal Roll produced by learned APP show that Sessions Court, Mumbai as on 16/9/2016 acquitted him and he has been released from prison on 17/9/2016. Nominal Roll is taken on record as Exh. A. Petition disposed of as infructuous.
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J)
Talwalkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave for cross-examination should be granted without obstruction in Sessions Case No. 637 of 2012.
Prakash Gopal Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Smt. Sadhana S. Jagdhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
