Disposed

Balasaheb Digambar Aghav v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC26 Aug 2019WP/2168/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Five writ petitioners challenged non-initiation of land acquisition proceedings. The court directed the acquiring body to remove proposal deficiencies in four months and initiate proceedings within six months, completing them under RFLRA 2013. Writ petitions disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Directions to remove deficiency in proposal within four months; initiate acquisition proceedings within six months; complete proceedings as per RFLRA 2013.

Balasaheb Digambar Aghav Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 190-WP-2183-19 & 4 Ors.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.2183 OF 2019

¶4

RAMESH BHIMRAJ KOTHARI ...PETITIONER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS Mr. Gaurav Deshpande, Advocate holdidng for Mr. K.D. Khade, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents-State Mr. V.M. Chate, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2168 OF 2019 BALASAHEB DIGAMBAR AGHAV ...PETITIONER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS Mr. Gaurav Deshpande, Advocate holdidng for Mr. K.D. Khade, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents-State Mr. V.M. Chate, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2169 OF 2019 VIMAL W/o RAMESHLAL DESARDA ...PETITIONER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS

¶5

2 190-WP-2183-19 & 4 Ors.

¶6

Mr. Gaurav Deshpande, Advocate holdidng for Mr. K.D. Khade, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents-State Mr. V.M. Chate, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7

¶7

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2172 OF 2019

¶8

VITHAL VISHWANATH DHAWAN ...PETITIONER

¶9

VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS

¶10

Mr. Gaurav Deshpande, Advocate holdidng for Mr. K.D. Khade, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents-State Mr. V.M. Chate, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7

¶11

AND

¶12

WRIT PETITION NO. 2182 OF 2019

¶13

SHAIIKH NABIB SHAIKH VAZIR ...PETITIONER

¶14

VERSUS

¶15

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Mr. Gaurav Deshpande, Advocate holdidng for Mr. K.D. Khade, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents-State Mr. V.M. Chate, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7

¶17

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶18

DATE : 26^th AUGUST, 2019

¶19

ORAL ORDER:

¶20

The grievance of the petitioners is that the acquisition

¶21

3 190-WP-2183-19 & 4 Ors.

¶22

proceedings are not initiated. The learned Counsel Mr. Chate for the Acquiring Body submits that in 2016, the proposal has been submitted to the Special Land Acquisition Officer under writ land.

¶23

It appears that the acquisition proceedings could not be initiated because the Acquiring Body did deposit the amount. The steps shall be taken by the Acquiring Body to remove the deficiency in the proposal within a period of four months and the land acquisition proceedings shall be initiated within a period of six months from today and shall be completed within the time stipulated under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

¶24

3. The Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶25

[ ANIL S.KILOR ] [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE

¶26

mta

Balasaheb Digambar Aghav v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balasaheb Digambar Aghav v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akshay Mohan Chavan and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

M/S Crescent Entertainment and Tourism Ltd. through Its Manager Manoj Ramnarayan Malu Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shaikh Mazharoddin Najir Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shaikh Nabib Shaikh Vazir Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others