In this oral order, the High Court invalidated the caste claim of the petitioner and directed the issue of notice to the respondents, which was subsequently waived by the A.G.P.
Notice issued to respondents, waived by A.G.P.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10661 OF 2019
Akshay Mohan Chavan and anr.
..Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
..Respondents
Mr S.C.Yeramwar, Advocate for petitioners Mr P.S.Patil, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 and 2
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 28.08.2019
ORAL ORDER :
( ANIL S. KILOR, J.)
( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vvr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the caste claim of the petitioner should be invalidated.
Whether the petitioner deserves a matrimonial settlement in his favour.
Akshay Mohan Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
