Dismissed
Jagdish Sarda v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/532/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner had no representation.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp-532.18.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 532 OF 2018
Jagdish Sarda … Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Prajot Jaggi for the Respondent No.2.
Smt. S.D. Shinde, APP for Respondent – State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI &
SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 2nd DECEMBER 2019.
P.C.:
1Nobody for petitioner even in second half. APP appears for
the State. Prajot Jaggi for intervenor. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 of 1
Jagdish Sarda
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
SADHANA S. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court