The application for leave to withdraw writ petition was entertained and disposed of as withdrawn without recording reasons. No substantive legal proposition was laid down in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp-1996.18.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1996 OF 2018
Haresh Lallubhai Mehta … Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Anr.… Respondents
Mr. Kartik S. Garg for the Petitioner.
Mr. Akshay R. Pai i/b. Bina R. Pai, for the Respondent No.2.
Smt. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI &
SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 2nd DECEMBER 2019.
P.C.:
1The learned counsel upon instructions seeks leave to
withdraw.
2 Keeping all contentions open, we dispose of petition aswithdrawn.
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 of 1
Haresh Lallubhai Mehta
State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dharmadhikari
Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court