Public interest litigation allowing petitioner to withdraw with liberty to file fresh petition after exhausting representations with authorities regarding incomplete information received.
Public interest litigation allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition upon receipt of complete information.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.88 OF 2019
MOHD AREF KHAN MOHD DULEKHAN PATHAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Kazi S.S.
AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.P. Sonpawale
...
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
AVINASH G.GHAROTE, JJ.
DATED : 13th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that though the petitioner made several attempts to
secure complete information, but the information
received by the petitioner is not complete and
satisfactory. Thus, the learned counsel on instructions
prayed for withdrawal of the present Public Interest
Litigation, with liberty to file fresh Public Interest
Litigation on receiving complete information. He
submits that the petitioner will approach the
authorities, and submit representations and in case
2 pil88.19
representations are not considered within reasonable
time, then the petitioner may be permitted to
approach this Court by filing fresh Public Interest
Litigation.
3.The petitioner is allowed to withdraw this
Public Interest Litigation with liberty as prayed
for.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE) (PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGEJUDGE
mahajansb/
MOHD AREF KHAN MOHD DULEKHAN PATHAN
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
PRASANNA B. VARALE
AVINASH G.GHAROTE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court