A PIL petition challenging the non-implementation of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act was disposed of as infructuous since the government decided not to implement the Act, thereby removing the controversy.
The PIL was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(20) PIL 52-17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Amk
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 52 OF 2017
Ms. Varsha Vidya Vilas & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate i/b Devyani Kulkarni for the Petitioners.
Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State. Dr. Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms. S. H. Mastakar for Respondent No.3-MCGM.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 24th JULY, 2019.
P. C. :
[N. M. JAMDAR, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE]
1/1
Ms. Varsha Vidya Vilas & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
N. M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
