Allowed

Nashik Municipal Corporation through the Municipal Commissioner and Anr. v. Nashik Nagarik Kruti Samiti

Bombay HC23 Jul 2019CAI/3/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court set aside a prior direction regarding Tree Authority constitution contrary to Section 3 of the Trees Act. It directed the Nashik Municipal Corporation to properly constitute the Tree Authority within four weeks following the decision in Zoru Darayus Bhathena.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Municipal Corporation, Nashik to constitute Tree Authority within four weeks as per the decision in Zoru Darayus Bhathena.

Nashik Municipal Corporation through the Municipal… — Environment and Pollution | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

skn 1 3.19-cai.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2019 IN

¶4

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 41 OF 2006

¶5

… Nashik Municipal Corporation & Anr. Applicant. In the matter between Nashik Nagarik Kruti Samiti. … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. … Respondents

¶6

Mr.R.D.Soni with Ranjeet Pawar for the applicant in CAI-37/19. None for the petitioner.

¶7

Mr.M.L.Patil for the applicant in CAI-30/17 and CAI-3/19

¶8

and Respondent No.1 in PIL 51/16 and Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in PIL 41/2006.

¶9

Ms.Lakshmi Bussa i/b. M.V.Kini &s Co. for Respondent No.6 in PIL No.41/2006 and Respondent No.3 in PIL No.51/2016.

¶10

Ms.S.V.Bharucha with Mr.N.D.Sharma for Respondent No.4 in PIL No.41/2006 and PIL No.51/2016.

¶11

Mr.P.P.Kakade, GP with Ms.Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 5, 7 & 8 in PIL No.d41/2006 and Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in PIL No.51/2016.

¶12

CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. AND N.M.JAMDAR, J. DATE : 23 July 2019.

¶13

P.C. :

¶14

The public interest litigation was filed raising an issue of trees being felled in the areas comprising Municipal Corporation,

¶15

skn 2 3.19-cai.doc

¶16

Nashik. The principal grievance emerged on account of Tree Authority not being constituted and this being in violation of the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975 (“Trees Act” for short). The order dated 2 May 2014 passed in the public interest litigation enlarges the scope of the proceedings by taking note of trees being felled on National Highway No.3 as well as on Manmad-Shirdi State Highway. Regarding trees being felled while expanding the highways, first direction issued in paragraph-16 was that compensatory planting should be resorted to and two retired Forest Officers named in the said direction were directed to supervise the same. Regarding felling of trees, it was directed that the Tree Authority shall be constituted as per decision in the case of Deepak Balkrishna Vahikar and another v. The State of Maharashtra and others¹ . Direction No.vii was that till the Tree Authority was constituted as per decision dated 20 September 2013, no tree shall be felled except with the permission of this Court.

¶17

By and under Civil Application No.3/2019 the Nashik Municipal Corporation informs that Tree Authority has been constituted comprising two Councillors and two Members. The constitution of Tree Authority as per the application is contrary to the requirement of sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 3 of the Trees Act for the reason as per sub-section (1) not less than 5 and not more than 15 members have to be appointed on the Tree Authority from

¶18

1 PIL No.93/2009 decided on 20 September 2013.

¶19

skn 3 3.19-cai.doc

¶20

amongst the members of the Municipal Corporation and as per subsection (3) expert members have to be as per sub-section (3). This Bench has clarified on the legal position in the recent judgment in the case of Zoru Darayus Bhathena v. Tree Authority, Mumbai and others² . The decision has explained the law declared in the case of Deepak Balkrishna Vahikar & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. (supra) and, thus, to the said extent direction No.(v) of paragraph-16 of the interim order dated 2 May 2014 requires to be set aside. We do so. However, pertaining to the application, we find that the Tree Authority has not been properly constituted by the Municipal Corporation, Nashik and, thus, we dispose of this application directing Municipal Corporation, Nashik to constitute Tree Authority within four weeks as per the decision in the case of Zoru Darayus Bhathena v. Tree Authority, Mumbai and others (supra) to which we have referred to herein-above.

¶21

N.M.JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE

¶22

2 O.S.PIL(L) No.60/2019 decided on 19 July 2019.

Nashik Municipal Corporation through the Municipal Commissioner and Anr. v. Nashik Nagarik Kruti Samiti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nashik Municipal Corporation through the Municipal Commissioner and Anr. v. Nashik Nagarik Kruti Samiti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

High Court on Its Own Motion on the Report/Letter DT.04/06/2015 Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Kamal Jagdish Singh Vs the Childrens Aid Society and 3 Ors.

Kamal Jagdish Singh Vs Devendra Fadnavis, President of the Children'S Aid Society and 3 Others

Smt. Ashwini Ashok Pawar Vs the Head Mistrees, Janata Shikshan Sanstha High School and Ors.

Saraswati Education Society Vs Piramal Finance Limited and 8 Ors.

Saraswati Education Society Vs Piramal Finance Limited and 8 Ors.