Petitioners sought to withdraw the Writ Petition due to lack of actionable averments. The High Court dismissed the petition as not pressed by the Petitioners.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(7.1)-WP-3977-18.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3977 OF 2018
Samasuddin Ansari & Ors. ..Petitioners Versus University of Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Abhishek Bhat, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. P. M. Palshikar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Rui A. Rodrigues, Advocate for University of Mumbai – Respondent No.2.
Mr. Zaid Mansuri i/by Amir Arsiwala, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATE : 4th OCTOBER, 2019
P.C.
1] After some arguments, counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition for the reason actionable averments have not been made therein.
2] The Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J CHIEF JUSTICE
BGP. 1 of 1
Samasuddin Ansari
University of Mumbai
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
