The High Court of Bombay dismissed a PIL petition regarding the Blockade of River Waldhuni by the petitioner as contradictory and unreasonable, ordering the file be consigned to the record room.
Petition rejected; file consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(13) PIL 24-18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 24 OF 2018
Hirali Foundation through its Secretary
& Trustee Mrs. Sarita Purshottam Khanchandani .. Petitioner Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents
Ms. Sana Baugwala for the Petitioner. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 8. Mr. Prashant Kamble i/b A. S. Rao for Respondent Nos.4 & 6. Mr. Abhijeet Joshi i/b Pooja Joshi for Respondent No.5. Mr. R. V. Govilkar a/w. Shaba Khan for Respondent No.7.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 6 th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
P. C. :
1/2
(13) PIL 24-18
[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
2/2
Hirali Foundation through Mrs. Sarita Purshottam Khanchandani
State of Maharashtra
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
