Dismissed
Shashikant Keshav Kini v. the State of Maharshtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/83/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
83-18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(14) PIL 83-18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 83 OF 2018
Shashikant Keshav Kini Vs.
.. Petitioner
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. G. T. Kanchanpurkar for the Petitioner. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 12. Mr. B. D. Joshi for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 6 th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
P. C. :
This is a frivolous Public Interest Litigation. Persons holding diploma in Civil Engineering are also entitled to be registered under the applicable bye-law and submit application on behalf of owners of land for sanction of a building plan. Respondent Nos.8,9 & 10 have a diploma in Civil Engineering and thus as per the bye-laws have been rightly permitted to act on behalf of the third party and submit application seeking sanction of the building plan. The Public Interest Litigation is dismissed.
[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
1/1
Shashikant Keshav Kini
The State of Maharashtra
Unknown Respondents 8-10
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court