Single judge dismissed the PIL for lack of cause of action and pleadings, granting liberty to withdraw and file a fresh petition with proper facts regarding electronic money transfer in banking.
Liberty granted to withdraw the petition with right to file a fresh petition after pleading relevant facts showing cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 of 2 1.(18)os.pil.5.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 5 OF 2017 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 243 OF 2017 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 5 OF 2017
Dr. Kanagasabapathy Sundaram Pillai .. Petitioner
Vs.
Governor, R.B.I. and Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Ram Apte Senior Advocate Amicus Curiae for Petitioner Mr. V.R. Dhond Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Aditi Phatale i/b Udwadia & Co. for Respondent No.1
Mr. Pranil Sonawane a/w Parag Vyas for Respondent No.2
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATED : AUGUST 27, 2019
P.C.:
jdk 2 of 2 1.(18)os.pil.5.17.doc
cause of action emerges. In what manner Electronic Transfer of Money would mean to banking has not been pleaded.
SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr. Kanagasabapathy Sundaram Pillai
Governor, R.B.I.
Respondent No.2
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
