Appeal against an impugned order in arbitration proceedings. The High Court addressed a 5-day delay in filing the appeal.
Condoned a delay of 5 days in filing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(14)-NMA-414-19.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTIE OF MOTION NO.414 OF 2019 IN APPEAL (L) NO.1 OF 2019 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1131 OF 2013
Hiralal & Co., and others
..Applicants
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Hiralal & Co., and others ..Appellants Versus Kashish Park Realtors and another ..Respondents
Mr. Cyrus Ardeshir I/by Mr. Rakesh Agarwal, Advocate for the Applicants/Appellants.
Mr. R. O. Agarwal I/by Mr. Meghnath Navlani, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATE : 27th AUGUST, 2019
P.C.
1] There is a delay of 5 days in filing the Appeal against the impugned order dated 29th November 2018. Learned counsel for the Respondents who appears on advance copy being served does not oppose the Notice of Motion.
BGP. 1 o f 2
(14)-NMA-414-19.doc .
2] The Notice of Motion is disposed of condoning 5 days delay in filing the Appeal.
SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J CHIEF JUSTICE
2 o f 2
BGP.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 5 days in filing the appeal against the impugned order deserves to be condoned.
How to dispose of the notice of motion filed to concur the delay.
Hiralal & Co., and others
Kashish Park Realtors and another
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
