This court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation regarding water supply to Manmad Town because the petitioners remained absent and failed to assist the court over a considerable period. The court held that judicial supervision alone cannot solve the issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh 4-PILG-17.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.17 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2013 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.17 OF 2013
Ashok Rupram Pardeshi & Others .... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.182 OF 2013 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.17 OF 2013
Altaf Tayyab Khan .... Applicant In the matter between Ashok Rupram Pardeshi & Others .... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents
Mr. Sagar Kasar for the Petitioners ( Absent ). Mr. P.P. Kakade, GP, with Mr. M.M. Pable, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr. Suresh Kumar with Ms Sumandevi Yadav for Respondent Nos.7 to 10.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 03, 2019
P.C:
suresh 4-PILG-17.2013.doc
details of the supply of water to Manmad Town/City. The position after October, 2016 is that though the petition was listed on 14-12-2016, none appeared for the petitioners. This Court desired a detailed plan in relation to the water supply to be placed on record. With all this as well the petitioners did not respond till 2017 at all.
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Digitally signed SURESH Page 2 of 2by SURESHJAGDISH JAGDISH SAJNAWAT SAJNAWAT Date:2019.12.07 10:59:08 +0530
Ashok Rupram Pardeshi & Others
Altaf Tayyab Khan
The State of Maharashtra & Others
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
R.I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
