The High Court disposed of PIL No.33 of 2013 regarding national rural drinking water programme. It held that monitoring state-wide water supply schemes exceeds the Court's expertise and resources. The PIL was also dismissed due to lack of effective assistance by petitioners over six years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-PILG-33.2013.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.33 OF 2013
Pradip Parshuram Phalke & Others .... Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.67 OF 2015 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.33 OF 2013
Chief Executive Officer .... Applicant In the matter between Pradip Parshuram Phalke & Others .... Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents
None for the Petitioners. Mr. Siddhesh Pilankar i/by Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for the Applicant. Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. K.P. Shah for Respondent No.5.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 03, 2019
P.C:
suresh 5-PILG-33.2013.doc
Programme, ensure that every village in the State is supplied clean and potable water.
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by SURESH SURESH JAGDISH JAGDISH SAJNAWAT SAJNAWAT Date: 2019.12.07 10:58:25 +0530
Pradip Parshuram Phalke & Others
State of Maharashtra & Others
Chief Executive Officer
S.C. Dharmadhikari
R.I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
