The High Court bench found that an order of this Court had been complied with by the school management, albeit belatedly. Consequently, the Court exercised discretion not to initiate further contempt proceedings and disposed of the contempt petition.
Contempt petition disposed of; no coercive action initiated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
cp.391.2009_19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.391 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3361 OF 2002
Sakharam Kundlik Patil … Petitioner
Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr.S.S. Patwardhan for the Petitioner
Mr.B.V. Samant, AGP, for Respondent No.1 Mr.S.S. Kanetkar for Resp. Nos.2 and 3 Mr.Tanaji Mhatugade for Resp. No.4
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 2, 2019
P.C.:
particularly, the copy of the order passed by the school.
Page 1 of 2
cp.391.2009_19.doc
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Sakharam Kundlik Patil
State of Maharashtra
S.C. Dharmadhikari
R.I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
