Dismissed
Subhanalla Imtiyaz Ali Khan v. Vice President Mhada and 7 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/15/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
15-18 IN THE HIGH
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(20) PIL 15-18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Amk
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 15 OF 2018
Subhanalla Imtiyaz Ali Khan .. Petitioner
Vs.
Vice President, MHADA, Bandra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Sachin Gelye for the Petitioner. Mr. Vishwajit Sawant for Respondent Nos.1 to 8.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2019.
P. C. :
The Petitioner is a contractor registered with MHADA and he questions award of work in 140 tenders in favour of different contractors. It is obvious that the Petitioner is not espousing a public because he has a private interest. Thus, the Public Interest Litigation is dismissed.
[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petitioner with a private interest in MHADA tenders qualifies to file a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
Subhanalla Imtiyaz Ali Khan
Vice President, MHADA, Bandra
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court