Public Interest Litigation wherein the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(21) PIL 22-18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Amk
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 22 OF 2018
Shri Dhananjaysinh Vinayakrao Jagtap .. Petitioner Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. Dhananjaysinh Vinayakrao Jagtap, Petitioner present in person. Mr. Anil Singh, Addl. Solicitor General a/w. Mr. Anand Singh for Respondent No.1-UOI.
Mr. Hemant Haryan, AGP for Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2019.
P. C. :
[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
1/1
Shri Dhananjaysinh Vinayakrao Jagtap
Union of India & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
