Shri. Rajesh Popatrao Shinde v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Public Interest Litigation rendered infructuous per instructions of the petitioner's counsel and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 23-PIL117.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.117 OF 2018
Rajesh Popatrao Shinde .. Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Manoj Patil for the Petitioner.
Ms. Carina Xavier for the Union of India.
CORAM: PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATED : 27th AUGUST, 2019.
P.C:-
(SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
AJN
Rajesh Popatrao Shinde
Union of India
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court