The Supreme Court Revenue side at Bombay adjourned a PIL matter due to paucity of time and directed the continuation of any interim relief operating till the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION STAMP NO. 21084 OF 2018
Dr. Dattatray Nana Mali
....Petitioner
V/S
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors.
....Respondent
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
R. I. CHAGLA, JJ DATE : 13th November, 2019
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 22/01/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Dr. Dattatray Nana Mali
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
R. I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
