The court, having heard counsel, formed a prima facie opinion that respondents are in contempt. A Contempt notice was issued under the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, returnable on a fixed date.
Issue of a Contempt notice against the respondents returnable on 5.12.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28 cpst 11998-19.doc
Pradnya Bhogale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION ST. NO. 11998 OF 2019
Parshuram Nagnath Kamale … Petitioner Vs. S.T. Bhalekar and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. S.D. Thokade for the petitioner. Ms. R.M. Shinde, AGP for State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 8th NOVEMBER, 2019.
P. C. :
Having heard learned counsel appearing for the respective
parties, we are, prima facie, of the opinion that respondents are in contempt. We, therefore, issue Contempt notice under Chapter XXXIV Rule 9 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, returnable on 5.12.2019.
[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents are prima facie in contempt.
Whether a Contempt notice should be issued against the respondents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parshuram Nagnath Kamale
S.T. Bhalekar
Ranjit More
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
