Bench disposed of PIL No.134 of 2012 and Notice of Motion No.26 of 2013 based on the Railway Board's affidavit regarding recruitment of additional personnel and lack of assistance from petitioners.
Disposed of PIL No.134 of 2012 and Notice of Motion No.26 of 2013 due to filing of affidavit and lack of assistance from petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
pil.134.2012+_902.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.134 OF 2012 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.26 OF 2013
Help Mumbai Foundation & anr. … Petitioners Vs Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi & Ors. … Respondents
with PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.148 OF 2015
Shri Dattatray Prakash Adarkar … Petitioner Vs Union of India … Respondent
None for the Petitioners in PIL/134/2012
Mr.D.P. Adarkar, Petitioner in person in PIL(L)/148/2015 – present
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Mr.T.J. Pandian for Resp. Nos.1, 2 and 3 in PIL/134/2012 and for Resp. in PIL(L)/148/2015
Ms.G.R. Shastri, Addl. G.P. for Resp. Nos.4 to 6 in PIL/134/2012
Ms.Jyoti Mani, Divisional Security Commissioner–I, Mumbai Division, Central Railway – present
Mr.S.R. Gandhi, Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, RPF, Mumbai Div. Wester Railway – present
Page 1 of 2
pil.134.2012+_902.doc
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2019
accordingly.
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Vishwanath S. Sherla
Digitally signed by Vishwanath S. Sherla Date: 2019.12.13 15:39:40 +0530
Page 2 of 2
Help Mumbai Foundation & anr.
Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi & Ors.
Shri Dattatray Prakash Adarkar
Union of India
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
R.I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
