The High Court disposed of connected public interest litigations and related proceedings after accepting mortgagee compliance with prior court directions and granting time for sub-station construction.
The public interest litigations and associated proceedings were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-PIL.13.2010.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 13 OF 2010
Shivashankar Jatashankar Joshi } Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. } Respondents
WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 58 OF 2012
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 30 OF 2014 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 109 OF 2013 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 351 OF 2018
Joshi Shivashankar Jatashankar } Petitioner versus The Secretary, Law and Judiciary } Department, and Ors. } Respondents
Mr.Shivashankar Jatashankar Joshi-petitioner appearing in-person-absent.
Ms.Jyoti Chavan-AGP for State.
Mr.P.G.Lad with Ms.Aparna Murlidharan and Ms.Sayali Apte for MHADA.
Ms.Kejali H. Mastakar for the Municipal Corporation.
Mr.Rahul Nerlekar for respondent nos. 4 to 7 in PIL/13/2010 and for respondent nos. 3, 18 and 19 in PIL/58/2012.
Mr.Tushad Kakalia with Mr.Paresh Patkar I/b. M/s.Mulla and Mulla C. B. and C. for Adani Electricity Limited in NMW/351/2018.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATED :- DECEMBER 13, 2019
Page 1 of 2
J.V.SALUNKE,PS
906-PIL.13.2010.doc
P.C. :-
(R.I.CHAGLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.SALUNKE,PS
Shivashankar Jatashankar Joshi
State of Maharashtra
The Secretary, Law and Judiciary Department
M/s. Adani Electricity Limited
S. C. Dharmadhikari
R. I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
