Disposed

Shivshankar Jatashankar Joshi v. State of Maharashtra and 7 Ors.

Bombay HC13 Dec 2019PIL/13/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposes of three public interest litigations and associated contempt and notice of motion proceedings. The court accepted findings that the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority complied with prior orders regarding land handover to Adani Electricity Limited for sub-station construction.

What did the court decide?

Public interest litigations and associated notice of motion, chamber summons, and contempt petition were disposed of.

Shivshankar Jatashankar Joshi Vs State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

906-PIL.13.2010.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 13 OF 2010

¶4

Shivashankar Jatashankar Joshi } Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. } Respondents

¶5

WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 58 OF 2012

¶6

WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 30 OF 2014 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 109 OF 2013 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 351 OF 2018

¶7

Joshi Shivashankar Jatashankar } Petitioner versus The Secretary, Law and Judiciary } Department, and Ors. } Respondents

¶8

Mr.Shivashankar Jatashankar Joshi-petitioner appearing in-person-absent.

¶9

Ms.Jyoti Chavan-AGP for State.

¶10

Mr.P.G.Lad with Ms.Aparna Murlidharan and Ms.Sayali Apte for MHADA.

¶11

Ms.Kejali H. Mastakar for the Municipal Corporation.

¶12

Mr.Rahul Nerlekar for respondent nos. 4 to 7 in PIL/13/2010 and for respondent nos. 3, 18 and 19 in PIL/58/2012.

¶13

Mr.Tushad Kakalia with Mr.Paresh Patkar I/b. M/s.Mulla and Mulla C. B. and C. for Adani Electricity Limited in NMW/351/2018.

¶14

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. I. CHAGLA, JJ.

¶15

DATED :- DECEMBER 13, 2019

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

J.V.SALUNKE,PS

¶18

906-PIL.13.2010.doc

¶19

P.C. :-

¶20

It is stated by the learned advocate appearing for M/s.Adani Electricity Limited that compliance has been made by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) with its statements made to this court and recorded in the prior order of 13^th November, 2019. The site has been handed over to M/s.Adani Electricity Limited for construction of a sub-station. It is stated that for that purpose, time of nine months has been granted. The company says that it will adhere to this time schedule and not seek any extension. The statement is accepted.

¶21

In the light of the above, the public interest litigations are disposed of. In the light of the disposal of the public interest litigations, the notice of motion, the chamber summons and the contempt petition do not survive and stand disposed of as such.

¶22

(R.I.CHAGLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶23

Page 2 of 2

¶24

J.V.SALUNKE,PS

Shivshankar Jatashankar Joshi v. State of Maharashtra and 7 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivshankar Jatashankar Joshi v. State of Maharashtra and 7 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uday Shetty Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dattatray Prakash Adarkar Vs Union of India

Help Mumbai Foundation and 2 Ors. Vs Chairman, Railway Board, and 5 Ors.

Mr. Pralhad Keshav Patil Vs State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Dept and Ors.

Kamlakar Motiram Satve and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. Irba Mashnaji Konapure vs State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader and Ors.

Parvez Razak Darvesh vs Dilawar Daud Gaonkhadkar and Ors.

Sandip Bacharan Metake vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Dept. and Ors.

Uday Shetty Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dattatray Prakash Adarkar Vs Union of India

Help Mumbai Foundation and 2 Ors. Vs Chairman, Railway Board, and 5 Ors.

Ashok Vitthal More Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development and Ors.

Vishnu Tukaram Bhosale Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development and Ors.

Ashok Vitthal More Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development and Ors.