The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad held that a contempt petition was meritless and an abuse of process. Petitioner's withdrawal was allowed, and the petition was disposed accordingly.
Contempt petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24cp841-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
24 CONT. PETITION NO.841 OF 2019
DHANRAJ NAVALRAI RIZWANI
VERSUS PRAJAKTA LAVANGARE VERMA AND ANR
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr V. C. Patil Ashtekar
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATE : 16th December, 2019
ORDER :
Page 1 of 3
24cp841-19
No.528/2019 was also filed by the petitioner i.e. Dhanraj Navalrai Rizwani with other petitioners. On a statement made before this Court by the learned A.G.P. that as per the directions of this Court the Hon’ble Minister had decided the Revision and considering the fact that the decision of the Hon’ble Minister results in non survival of any grievance of the petitioner, Contempt Petition No. 528/2019 was disposed of.
Page 2 of 3
their personal interest. With this note of caution, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the petition. Contempt petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
JPC
Page 3 of 3
DHANRAJ NAVALRAI RIZWANI
PRAJAKTA LAVANGARE VERMA AND ANR
PRASANNA B. VARALE
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
