The petitioner's advocate admitted compliance with the Court's order and receipt of compensation, thereby extinguishing the grievance. The contempt petition was dismissed as no compliance issue remained.
Petitioner requested compliance; relief granted by attributing the petitioner to the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
355.18cp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.355 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5963 OF 2016
Rajesh s/o Ramdas Chavan
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr D. R. Shelke, Advocate for petitioner; Mr K. N. Lokhande, A.G.P. for respondents/State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 13th December, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Not on board. Taken on board.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
sjk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner raised any substantive points against the order of this Court.
Rajesh s/o Ramdas Chavan
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
Prasannta B. Varale
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
