Contempt petition disposed of by this Court after petitioner's counsel submitted that the impugned order was duly complied with and the grievance no longer survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 938-cp-661-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 661 OF 2019
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2236 OF 2015
Dr. Prabhakarrao Shesherao Kadam
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another
… Petitioner
… Respondents
Mr. V. P. Kadam, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. S. G. Sangle, AGP for the State.
Mr. S. S. Bora, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED : 18th OCTOBER, 2019
PER COURT :-
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition is
filed raising the grievance of non compliance of the order of this Court
and post filing the petition, the order of this Court is duly complied
with and the grievance of the petitioner no more survives.
2.In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the
contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.
[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ]
[ PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. ]
SMS
1 of 1
Dr. Prabhakarrao Shesherao Kadam
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
R. G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court