In a contempt petition, the AGP placed the order of the Scrutiny Committee, which rejected the petitioner's tribal claim. The petitioner admitted this. The court held nothing survived as the charge was met.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
942 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.49 OF 2019 IN WP/10668/2018
ABHIJEET ANNASAHEB NIKAM VERSUS SANDEEP D. GOLAID AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sagar S. Phatale AGP for Respondent State : Mrs.M.A.Deshpande
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. Date: November 07, 2019
PER COURT :-
( ANIL S. KILOR, J. ) ( PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. )
SPT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anything survives in the contempt petition after the respondent decision is placed on record and admitted.
Abhijeet Annasaheb Nikam
Sandeep D. Golaid
Prasanna B. Varale
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
