Disposed

Omprakash Sitaram Agrawal and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC6 Nov 2019CP/778/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a contempt petition arising from a writ petition regarding land acquisition compensation. Based on proof of deposit of compensation money by the municipal corporation, the court permitted withdrawal of the funds and held nothing survived.

What did the court decide?

Permitted withdrawal of Rs. 1,32,45,765 deposited by Jalgaon Municipal Corporation; contempt petition disposed of.

Omprakash Sitaram Agrawal and Another Vs State of… — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

778.18cp

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 778 OF 2018 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 4168 OF 2015

¶6

Omprakash Sitaram Agrawal, Age: 69 years, Occ: Business & Agri., R/o.122, Navi Peth, Jalgaon, Tq. and Dist. Jalgaon

¶7

Satish Soma Bhole, Age: 63 years, Occ: Business & Agri., R/o. Shivaram Nagar, Jalgaon, Tq. and Dist. Jalgaon ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶8

State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Shri. Nitin Kareer, Age: Major, Occ: Service, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32

¶9

The Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra State, Shri. N.R. Shende, Age: Major, Occ: Service, R/o. As above 3. The Collector, Jalgaon District, Jalgaon Shri. Kishor Raje Nimbalkar Age: Major, Occ: Service, R/o. As above 4. Jalgaon Municipal Corporation, Jalgaon Through its Commissioner, Shri. Kishor Raje Nimbalkar, Age: Major, Occ: Service, R/o. As above ..RESPONDENTS

¶10

778.18cp

¶11

(2)

¶12

Mr Ajeet B. Kale, Advocate for petitioners; Mrs P. V. Diggikar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3; Mr V.D. Gunale, Advocate for respondent No.4

¶13

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶14

DATE : 6th NOVEMBER, 2019

¶15

ORAL ORDER:

¶16

Heard Mr. Kale, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Gunale, learned Counsel for respondent No.4.

¶17

Perused the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 19^th July, 2019 as well as 25^th September, 2019.

¶18

Mr. Gunale, learned Counsel for respondent No.4 placed on record the copy of receipt duly signed by the Chief Accounts Officer and the Deputy Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation, Jalgaon regarding deposit of the amount of Rs.1,32,45,765/- (Rs. One crore thirty two lacs forty five thousand and seven hundred sixty five ) in the office of Land Acquisition Officer and Sub Divisional Officer, Jalgaon.

¶19

In view of this fact, the petitioner is permitted to submit an application to the Land Acquisition Officer for withdrawal of the

¶20

778.18cp (3)

¶21

said amount within one week from today. On receipt of such application, Land Acquisition Officer to release the amount in favour of the petitioner.

¶22

In view of above directions, nothing survives in the contempt petition. As such, same is accordingly disposed of.

¶23

(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

¶24

Tupe

Omprakash Sitaram Agrawal and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Omprakash Sitaram Agrawal and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Imam Ahmed Raza Education Society, Beed Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ashroba Kadaji Shelke and Another Vs the Union of India and Others

Shaikh Turab Shaikh Shamat and Another Vs the Government of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Tribal Development Dept Mumbai and Others

Durgabai Parasram Karhale and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Govind Bapurao Jotkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gurukrupa Gas Service through Its Proprietor Vs the Union of India and Others