The court disposed of a contempt petition on the submission of the petitioners' counsel that the grievance had been redressed and regular salary was being received, recognizing nothing survived in the petition.
Contempt petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
939 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.28 OF 2019 IN WP/12465/2018
SHIVAJI HARIBHAU NIMGAONKAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Sunil V. Warad AGP for Respondents State : Mr.S.P.Sonpawale
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. Date: November 07, 2019
PER COURT :-
( ANIL S. KILOR, J. ) ( PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. )
SPT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grievance of the petitioners has been fully redressed rendering the contempt petition devoid of merit.
SHIVAJI HARIBHAU NIMGAONKAR AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
PRASANNA B. VARALE
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
