The petitioner in the contempt petition prayed for and obtained withdrawal of the petition. The High Court allowed the petition to be withdrawn and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Contempt petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
240.17cp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.240 OF 2017 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.49 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.644 OF 2015
Allauddn s/o Kondaji Chaudhari
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
Arvind Mohare & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr P. S. Dighe, Advocate holding for Mr V. R. Dhorde, Advocate for petitioner
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : 22nd August, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, prays for withdrawal of the petition. The contempt petition is allowed to be withdrawn and same is disposed of as withdrawn.
(R. G. AVACHAT, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
sjk
Allauddin s/o Kondaji Chaudhari
Arvind Mohare & ors.
Prasanna B. Varale
R. G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
