Allowed

Indira Education and Welfare Society Parbhani Thr Secretary v. Najmunnisa Begum Abdul Sattar and Another

Bombay HC20 Aug 2019CA/6651/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the applicant's civil application for condonation of a 34-day delay in filing a review application. Time was also granted to one respondent to file their reply affidavit, and the matter was stand over.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay of 34 days in filing review application; two weeks time granted to respondent No.1.

Indira Education and Welfare Society Parbhani… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

( 1 )

¶2

6651.18ca

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6651 OF 2019

¶5

IN

¶6

REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.16491 OF 2019
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1079 OF 2019

¶7

Indira Education and Welfare Society,
Parbhani through Secretary

¶8

APPLICANT

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

Najmunnisa Begum Abdul Sattar & anr

¶11

RESPONDENTS

¶12

Ms Fatema S. Kazi, Advocate for the applicant;
Mr A.N. Sabnis, Advocate for respondent No. 1;
Mr B.A. Shinde, Advocate for respondent No.2

¶13

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &

¶14

R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.

¶15

DATED :20th AUGUST, 2019

¶16

ORAL ORDER:

¶17

By present civil application, the applicant

¶18

prays for condonation of delay of 34 days caused in

¶19

filing the review application. The delay caused is due to

¶20

bona fide reasons.

¶21

2.The submission of learned Counsel for the

¶22

applicant is, the applicant is approaching this Court on
the ground of misrepresentation of the facts seeking
review of the order passed by this Court.

¶23

3.Mr. Sabnis, learned Counsel who has been

¶24

instructed to appear on behalf of respondent No.1 opposed
the application.

¶25

4.Though the application is opposed, in view of

¶26

the submission of learned Counsel for the applicant and

¶27

for the reasons stated in the application, the

¶28

application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A).

¶29

5.So far as Review Application (ST.) No. 16491 of
2019 is concerned, Mr. Sabnis, learned Counsel submitted
that recently he has been instructed to appear on behalf
of respondent No.1 and prays time to file power as well
as affidavit in reply to review application.

¶30

6.At the request of Mr. Sabnis, learned Counsel

¶31

for respondent No.1, two weeks time is granted.

¶32

7. Stand over to 3rd September, 2019.

¶33

[R.G. AVACHAT, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.]

¶34

Tupe

Indira Education and Welfare Society Parbhani Thr Secretary v. Najmunnisa Begum Abdul Sattar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indira Education and Welfare Society Parbhani Thr Secretary v. Najmunnisa Begum Abdul Sattar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogesh Madhukar Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Anna Sitaram Unde Thorugh Lrs Ratanbai Annasaheb Unde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Prakash Kahnuchand Pardeshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sarvadharm Samhav Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Kendra Thourgh Secretary Bhimrao Laxman Bhagat Vs Dinesh Waghmare Secretary Social Jusice and Special Assistance Deaprtment

Santosh Supada Sonune Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Keshav Ramrao Bangar and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others