Contempt petition applicant Anna Unde filed a civil application challenging a contempt order. The single-judge Bench at Aurangabad allowed the application granting the relief sought in prayer clause (B) solely based on the application's stated reasons.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9769 OF 2019 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3444 OF 2015 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.93 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.63 OF 2006
Anna s/o Sitaram Unde, Died L.R. Smt. Ratnabai w/o Annasaheb Unde
... APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri M.G. Kolse Patil, Advocate for applicant Shri V.S. Badakh, A.G.P. for State
CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ. DATED : 14th AUGUST, 2019.
ORAL ORDER :
For the reasons stated in the application, the application
is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
(R.G. AVACHAT) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/-
Anna s/o Sitaram Unde, Died L.R. Smt. Ratnabai w/o Annasaheb Unde
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
Prasanna B. Varale
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
