Allowed
Prakash Kahnuchand Pardeshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCCA/1532/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1532 OF 2016 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3444 OF 2015 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.93 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.63 OF 2006
Prakash s/o Kahnuchand Pardeshi
... APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri M.G. Kolse Patil, Advocate for applicants Shri V.S. Badakh, A.G.P. for State
CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED : 14th AUGUST, 2019.
ORAL ORDER :
For the reasons stated in the application, the application
is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
(R.G. AVACHAT) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/-
Prakh s/o Kahnuchand Pardeshi
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
PRASANNA B VARALE
R G AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court