Petitioners sought withdrawal of a contempt petition regarding demolished property, requesting monetary compensation. The court permitted withdrawal without expressing an opinion on the merits or entitlement of the rights.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach competent forum for compensation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
12. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 321 OF 2019
IN PIL/12/2015
Navnath Eknath Shekade and others ...Petitioners Versus Shaikh Sameer Rashid and others ...Respondents
Mr. N.V. Gawaare, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. V.S. Badakh, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent No.4
C ORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, AND R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : 13th August, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
( R. G. AVACHAT ) ( PRASANNA B. VARALE ) JUDGE JUDGE
Madkar
Navnath Eknath Shekade and others
Shaikh Sameer Rashid and others
Prasanla B. Varale
R. G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
