High Court disposed of a civil application effectively modifying a writ petition proceeding involving an education institution, allowing the applicant to add an Administrator as a representative for the Society respondent.
Civil application disposed of. Hamdast allowed; notice issued against the amended respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
936
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4383 OF 2019
IN WRIT PETITION NO.5417/2018
VAISHALI RAMLING TODKARI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Panpatte V.S.
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. Y. G. Gujrati
Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. S.S. Choudhari
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.
DATE:5th April, 2019
PER COURT :
1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that
Administrator is appointed over respondent No.4
Society. Learned counsel for respondent No.5,
Headmaster of the School, also submits that
Administrator is appointed over respondent No.4. In
view of that, applicant is permitted to add the
Administrator as a person representing respondent No.4
in place of the Secretary. Civil application disposed
of.
2. After the title clause of the writ petition is
amended with regard to respondent No.4, issue notice
to respondent No.4 in the writ petition, returnable on
11.06.2019. Hamdast allowed.
JPC
1/1
VAISHALI RAMLING TODKARI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
OTHERS
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
A. M. DHAVALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court