Nihal Jafarsab Saudagar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What did the court decide?
Civil application allowed; delay condoned; application disposed of.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
Civil application allowed; delay condoned; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca 12255.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12255 OF 2018 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 27913 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 10454 OF 2017
NIHAL JAFARSAB SAUDAGAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Applicant :
Mr. Patil Indrale Anand V.
AGP for Respondents No. 1 to 3 : Mr. S. P. Tiwari
Advocate for Respondent No. 4 :
Mr. A. A. Mukhedkar
...
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.
DATE: 12th APRIL, 2019
PER COURT :
1.Heard learned counsel for the respective
parties.
2.For the reasons stated in the civil
application, the civil application is allowed.
Delay is condoned.
3. Civil Application stands disposed of.
[A. M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
NIHAL JAFARSAB SAUDAGAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
A. M. DHAVALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court