Petitioner submits that the proposed witness expired, making the writ petition infructuous. Court vacated earlier interim relief and disposed of the matter.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3428 OF 2014
Murlidhar Ramnath Dalvi & another ...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
Ramchandra Dasharath Ghuge & others ...RESPONDENTS
Mr. Nikhil S. Jaju Advocate for petitioners
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE, J.
DATED : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2019.
ORAL ORDER :
2 This Court has already vacated the interim relief. In view of these circumstances, the matter has become infructuous and stands disposed of.
( T.V. NALAWADE ) JUDGE
vbd
Murlidhar Ramnath Dalvi
Ramchandra Dasharath Ghuge
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
