Allowed

Musa Amirsab Sagari v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC15 Jan 2019BA/91/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application, the court considered an offence arising from a familial dispute over water rights. Despite relations between parties and injuries to a co-accused, the court granted regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in like amount under conditions of not influencing witnesses and not entering police jurisdiction till framing

Musa Amirsab Sagari Vs the State of Maharashtra — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 5) ba91-19.doc

¶2

SAS

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.91 OF 2018

¶6

Musa Amirsab Sagari ..Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.

¶7

Mr.Sachin Deokar I/b. Mohammed S.Mulla for the applicant.

¶8

Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for the respondent-State.

¶9

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

¶10

DATE : JANUARY 15, 2019

¶11

P.C.:-

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

¶13

In crime No.407/2018 for offfence punishable under sections 325, 325, 324, 323, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Akkalkot North police station, District Solapur, the applicant was arrested on September 29, 2018 and is charge-sheeted is seeking regular bail.

¶14

The complainant and the present applicant are real brothers and there was dispute over the right to draw water from well in the agricultural land. The parties are already in litigation

¶15

2 5) ba91-19.doc

¶16

before the Civil Court to the extend of their rights to draw water from the well in question.

¶17

A prayer for injunction made by the complainant was also rejected. One of the co-accused namely Mahiboob Musa, son of the applicant had also suffered grievous injuries in the crime in question.

¶18

In the aforesaid backdrop, in my opinion, the applicant deserves to be released on bail. Hence, the order.

¶19

i) The applicant be released on bail in Crime No.407/2018 for offfence punishable under section 325, 325, 324, 323, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Akkalkot North police station, District Solapur upon furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount;

¶20

ii) The applicant shall not influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

¶21

iii) Till the framing of charge, the applicant shall not enter the jurisdiction of the concerned police station;

¶22

iv) The application is disposed of accordingly.

¶23

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )

Musa Amirsab Sagari v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Musa Amirsab Sagari v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akash Subhash Gade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ramesh Maruti Patil and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Pandurang @ Bapu Yeshwant Gandale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mehtab Nijamuddin Sayyed Vs the Sr. Police Inspector and Anr.

Saurabh Kailas Choudhari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rishikesh Dinkar Galave Vs the State of Maharashtra