Dismissed
Akash Subhash Gade v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCBA/6/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ISM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 47.6.19 ba.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2019
Akash Subhash Gade .....Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
.....Respondent
Mr. Abhaykumar Apte advocate for the applicant Mr. S. S. Hulke APP for the State
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : JANUARY 14, 2019.
P.C.
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned
APP.
2 Applicant is seeking regular bail in Crime No. 232/2018 registered with Sinhgad Road Police Station, Pune for offence punishable under sections 307, 364, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Applicant came to be arrested on 23/05/2018 and is charge-sheeted.
2 47.6.19 ba.doc
3 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. but for one, none of the eye witnesses have identified the applicant for want of identification parade. He would also try to rely upon certain contradictions in the statement of the eye witnesses.
4 If the aforesaid submissions are considered in the light of the statement of the eye witnesses and also that of victim Jotiba, the applicant was identified by the victim Jotiba in identification parade.
5 Apart from above, the fact that each of the eye witnesses should have been called in identification parade need not be appreciated at this stage of the proceedings. As far as the issue of contradiction is concerned, same cannot be gone into at this stage.
There is strong material available against the applicant of prima facie involvement. Application fails, stands rejected.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the applicant who is charged with offences under sections 307, 364, 323, 504, and 506 r/w 34 IPC.
Akash Subhash Gade
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W.ambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court