The court disposed of the anticipatory bail application as infructuous due to the arrest of the applicant before the hearing. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 56.16.19 aba.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2019
Ramesh Maruti Patil and others .....Applicants
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent
Mr. Gaurav Parkar advocate for the applicant Mr. S. S. Hulke APP for the State
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : JANUARY 14, 2019.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the applicant submits that in view of
the arrest of the applicant matter has rendered infructuous. Application stands disposed of accordingly.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Ramesh Maruti Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Nitib W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
