A criminal bail application was filed under sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and section 184 MV Act. The court refused bail because the investigation is ongoing and a co-accused is absconding.
Bail application rejected on grounds of pending investigation and absconding of a co-accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 903) ba67-19.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.67 OF 2019
Balaji Vasant Wakade ..Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashok B. Tajane for the applicant.
Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for the respondent-State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : JANUARY 18, 2019
P.C.:-
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned
APP for the State.
sections 279, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code and section 184 of the Motor Vehicle Act registered with Pangiri police station, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur, the applicant is seeking regular bail.
witness to the incident. The victim was her father who died
2 903) ba67-19.doc
because of rash and negligent on the part of the present applicant.
Investigation is in progress and one of the co-accused is absconding. That being so, the application is rejected.
( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted given that the victim is deceased and one co-accused is absconding.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Balaji Vasant Wakade
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
