In bail application No. 130 of 2019, the High Court of Bombay Criminal Jurisdiction granted bail to the applicant, ordering release on same terms as principal accused in similar case under POCSO and IPC Section 376.
Released on bail on same terms and conditions as imposed in bail order dated 2nd November 2018 against main accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 Yadav 904.ba.130.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 130 OF 2019
Rameshwar Laxman Najan … Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Aaditya A. Gore for Applicant.
Ms. S. S. Kaushik, APP for Respondent – State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2019.
P.C. :
. The main accused Prasad Narwade in Crime No. 98 of 2017 for an offence punishable under Sections 376, 376 (n) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4, 6 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act already ordered to be released on bail by this Court on 2nd November 2018. The nature of the allegations against the present Applicant appears to be similar.
2/2 Yadav 904.ba.130.19
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether applicant deserves bail on same terms as main accused Prasad Narwade since nature of allegations is similar.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Prasad Narwade bail order dated 2nd November 2018Applied¶9
8 provisions across 3 enactments
Rameshwar Laxman Najan
State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
