This short order notes that the applicant sought permission to withdraw the bail application due to DNA report submissions. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn.
Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 Yadav 34.ba.41.2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2019
Mohasin @ Lalya Rajak Pathan … Applicant Versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Rushikesh Kale I/by Viresh V. Purwant for Applicant. Ms. S. S. Kaushik, APP for Respondent – State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : JANUARY 18, 2019.
P.C. :
. In view of subsequent development of submission of DNA
Report, the learned Counsel for Applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present Applicant.
withdrawn.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Mohasin @ Lalya Rajak Pathan
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
