The High Court allowed the applicant to withdraw his bail application with liberty to file it before the trial court. The intervening application was dismissed as infructuous.
Leave to withdraw application allowed; intervention application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ppn 1 17.ba-455.19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.455 OF 2019 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.516 OF 2019
Machhindra Shankar Tingare .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Sharad V. Kulkarni for the applicant. Mr.S.H. Yadav, APP for respondent-State. Mr.Shailesh Chavan for intervener. Mr.T.S.Sanap, Police Constable, Baramati City Police Station.
CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 4th April 2019
P.C.:
. Learned APP, on instructions, makes a statement that
charge-sheet in this crime is filed before competent Court. In view of
above, learned counsel for applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file same before trial Court.
as allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Intervention application is rendered as infructuous and stands dismissed.
P.N. DESHMUKH, J.
Machhindra Shankar Tingare
State of Maharashtra
Shailesh Chavan
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
