In an anticipatory bail application, the learned A.P.P. placed a police report on record. The applicant's counsel, noting the investigation recommendation, sought withdrawal of the application. The grant of withdrawal disposed of the application.
Leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application allowed; application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.ABA.2121.18 wt.APPP.1387.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2121 OF 2018
Uttam Kisan Kadam & Ors. ... Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1387 OF 2018 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2121 OF 2018
| Gaurav Dipak Sonavane | … | Intervener |
|---|---|---|
| In the matter between | ||
| Uttam Kisan Kadam & Ors. Versus |
... | Applicants |
| The State of Maharashtra | ... | Respondent |
Mr. A.M. Chimalkar a/w Mr. Subash Jadhav a/w Mr. Yashovardhan Deshmukh i/b Juris Corp for the Applicants. Mr. Prashant Jadhav, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State. Mr. Chetan Alai a/w Mr. Anup Lahoti for Intervener.
Mr. Sandip Pawar, Bharti Vidyapith Police Station, Pune, present.
CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 3rd APRIL, 2019.
P.C. :
1 Learned A.P.P. has placed on record police report. Same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. According to which on
investigation, police had recommended 'C' summary which is forwarded to
1/2
Waghmare
4.ABA.2121.18 wt.APPP.1387.18.doc
Assistant C.P., Pune City, for his approval and thereafter, can be placed before the trial Court. In that view of the matter, learned Counsel for applicant did not press for this application and seeks leave to withdraw the same.
2 In the circumstances leave as prayed is allowed. Application is disposed of as allowed to be withdrawn.
3 In view of above facts, Application No.1387 of 2018 by complainant for intervention since rendered infructuous, stands disposed of accordingly, with liberty in favour of complainant to contest 'C' summary proceedings, if found necessary.
(P.N. DESHMUKH, J.)
2/2
Waghmare
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Uttam Kisan Kadam & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
P.N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
