Allowed

Suraj Chandrakant Tiwale v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC4 Apr 2019ABA/155/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application, the Single Judge examined the role attributed to the applicant, noting simple injuries caused. Confirming an interim order, the court granted bail subject to conditions barring entry into Kolhapur City and requiring appearance before the Investigating Officer.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed and interim order confirmed with direction not to enter Kolhapur City jurisdiction except to appear before IO.

Suraj Chandrakant Tiwale Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

ppn 1 6.aba-155.19.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.155 OF 2019

¶4

Suraj Chandrakant Tiwale .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶5

Mr.Satyavrat Joshi for the applicant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for respondent-State. Mr.Arvind Kamble, API, Karveer Police Station, Kolhapur.

¶6

CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 4^th April 2019

¶7

P.C.:

¶8

. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned APP for

¶9

respondent-State. Perused case diary.

¶10

Learned APP has also tendered at bar copy of injury report of complainant. According to report, he has sustained two simple injuries and has obtained discharge against medical advise. Learned APP submits that admittedly, complainant is no more alive as on today and co-accused Javed who is assigned with the role of assault is granted anticipatory bail by trial Court. While considering applicant's entitlement for grant of interim protection, it is observed that though alleged assault by applicant is by knife, same is on little finger and thumb of which according to injury report, injuries caused are simple in nature while co-accused

¶11

ppn 2 6.aba-155.19.doc

¶12

Javed is attributed with assault by wooden rod on the head of complainant along with other assailants.

¶13

In view of role attributed to applicant as aforesaid by which applicant is alleged to have caused two simple injuries, and co-accused Javed who has assaulted by wooden rod, on head of complainant which according to medical certificate are also simple injuries, applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail, though learned APP submits that there are criminal elements having various offences registered against him with Karveer Police Station at Kolhapur, by imposing suitable conditions on applicant as per following order :-

¶14

ORDER

¶15

(i) Interim order dated 15^th March 2019 granting interim bail to applicant is confirmed with direction to applicant to attend Investigating Officer as and when called till filing of charge-sheet;

¶16

(ii) Applicant shall not enter within the territorial jurisdiction of Kolhapur City, except for marking his presence with Investigating Officer and subsequently as and when called till filing of charge-sheet;

¶17

(iii) Application is disposed of in above terms.

¶18

P.N. DESHMUKH, J.

Suraj Chandrakant Tiwale v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Chandrakant Tiwale v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaurav Dipak Sonavane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Mukta Tukaram Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shrikant Bapurao Shirke Vs the State of Maharashtra

Aniket Arvind Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Machindra Shankar Tingare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Venkatesh Suresh Hullur Vs the State of Maharashtra