Nityanand Manikam Devendra v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal bail application was filed seeking enlargement in connection with offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The Court, noting the applicant's antecedents and the serious nature of charges, rejected the bail application citing fit case standards but expediting the trial.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; trial expeditied pending final merits by the learned Judicial Magistrate.
What the court decided
21-ba.279.2019.doc
1/3
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.279 OF 2019
Nityanand Manikam Devendra @Nitya ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr.A.M.Shaikh, for the Applicant.
Mr. A.R.Kapadnis, A.P.P for the Respondent - State.
API – Gajjal, Central Unit Crime Branch, Navi Mumbai, is present.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
DATE : 17th JULY, 2019
P.C. :
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail given his antecedents and the serious nature of offences.
Whether the trial of the applicant should be expedited pending bail consideration.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nityanand Manikam Devendra @Nitya
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Revati Mohite Dere
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court